Opinion
Argued February 3, 1874
Decided February 17, 1874
G.C. Ripsom for the appellant.
Edward Harris for the respondent.
Agree to affirm on opinion of MULLIN, J., below.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Haskins v. New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 17, 1874
56 N.Y. 608 (N.Y. 1874)
Summaries of
Haskins v. New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 17, 1874
56 N.Y. 608 (N.Y. 1874)
Case details for
Haskins v. New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co.
Case Details
Full title:IRA HASKINS, Administrator, etc., Appellant, v . THE NEW YORK CENTRAL AND…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Feb 17, 1874
Citations
56 N.Y. 608 (N.Y. 1874)
Citing Cases
Windover v. Troy City R. Co.
If, however, in the service of the defendant, Windover discovered that it had failed to furnish proper…
Marrinan v. N.Y. Central H.R.R.R. Co.) But this is not the rule in the State of New York. ( Baulec v. N.Y. Harlem R.R. Co., 59 N.Y. 356; Lyons v.…