From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hash v. Rallos

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 20, 2023
2:17-cv-1721 TLN AC P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 20, 2023)

Opinion

2:17-cv-1721 TLN AC P

07-20-2023

LAWRENCE GEORGE HASH, Plaintiff, v. T. RALLOS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff filed a motion for a thirty-day extension of time to oppose defendants' motion for an extension of time to respond to requests for production. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 131) is GRANTED; and

2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the service of this order to file his opposition to defendants' motion for an extension of time.


Summaries of

Hash v. Rallos

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 20, 2023
2:17-cv-1721 TLN AC P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 20, 2023)
Case details for

Hash v. Rallos

Case Details

Full title:LAWRENCE GEORGE HASH, Plaintiff, v. T. RALLOS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 20, 2023

Citations

2:17-cv-1721 TLN AC P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 20, 2023)