From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hash v. Rallos

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 13, 2022
2:17-cv-1721 TLN AC P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2022)

Opinion

2:17-cv-1721 TLN AC P

10-13-2022

LAWRENCE GEORGE HASH, Plaintiff, v. T. RALLOS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff filed a second motion for extension of time to file written discovery requests. ECF No. 76. The motion will be granted, and the deadline for plaintiff to file any motions to compel will be extended accordingly. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 76) is GRANTED;

2. Plaintiff shall have thirty days from the filing of this order to serve requests for discovery pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 31 (deposition by written question), 33 (interrogatories), 34 (production of documents), or 36 (admissions); and

3. Plaintiff shall have until January 13, 2023, to file any motions necessary to compel discovery.


Summaries of

Hash v. Rallos

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 13, 2022
2:17-cv-1721 TLN AC P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2022)
Case details for

Hash v. Rallos

Case Details

Full title:LAWRENCE GEORGE HASH, Plaintiff, v. T. RALLOS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 13, 2022

Citations

2:17-cv-1721 TLN AC P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2022)