From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harvester v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 10, 2011
62 So. 3d 1235 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

Opinion

No. 2D10-3066.

June 10, 2011.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Daniel L. Perry, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Cynthia J. Dodge, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Sara Macks, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


Tammy Lynn Harvester challenges the revocation of her community control after she admitted to violating two conditions of her supervision. We affirm both the revocation and her resulting sentences without further comment. However, the State correctly concedes that the written order of revocation erroneously reflects that Harvester admitted to violating three conditions of her community control when the transcript of the revocation hearing shows that she admitted to violating only two conditions. The trial court orally revoked her community control based only on the two admitted violations. We therefore remand for the limited purpose of the entry of a corrected written order of revocation which conforms with the oral pronouncement. See McNeil v. State, 908 So.2d 556, 557 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).

Affirmed and remanded for entry of a corrected order.

NORTHCUTT and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Harvester v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 10, 2011
62 So. 3d 1235 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)
Case details for

Harvester v. State

Case Details

Full title:Tammy Lynn HARVESTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jun 10, 2011

Citations

62 So. 3d 1235 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

Citing Cases

Kuczko v. State

We therefore remand for the limited purpose of the entry of a corrected written order of revocation which…