From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harty v. Roedel Partners of MT. Kisco, LLC

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 15, 2021
19-CV-9464 (KMK) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 15, 2021)

Opinion

19-CV-9464 (KMK)

09-15-2021

OWEN HARTY, Plaintiff, v. ROEDEL PARTNERS OF MT. KISCO, LLC et al., Defendants.


ORDER

KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge:

Owen Harty (“Plaintiff”) brings this Action pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act (the “ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12131, et seq. and the New York State Human Rights Law, N.Y. Exec. § 296(2)(a) against Roedel Partners of Mt. Kisco, LLC and Roedel Partners of Mt. Kisco II, LLC (together “Defendants.”) Plaintiff, a self-proclaimed ADA tester, visited third-party websites which provide the ability to book rooms at the Holiday Inn Mt. Kisco owned and operated by Defendants and found that these websites were not compliant with the ADA. (See Compl. (Dkt. No. 1).) Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief and attorney's fees, litigation expenses, and costs under the ADA. (See id.) Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendants' Cross Motion for Summary Judgment (the “Motions.”) (See Dkt. Nos. 35, 38.) The Court dismisses the Motions without prejudice to be renewed once the Second Circuit rules on Harty v. West Point Realty, Inc., No. 20-2672. The Parties should address that decision in their renewed papers.

The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to terminate the pending Motions. (Dkt. Nos. 35, 38.)

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Harty v. Roedel Partners of MT. Kisco, LLC

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 15, 2021
19-CV-9464 (KMK) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 15, 2021)
Case details for

Harty v. Roedel Partners of MT. Kisco, LLC

Case Details

Full title:OWEN HARTY, Plaintiff, v. ROEDEL PARTNERS OF MT. KISCO, LLC et al.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 15, 2021

Citations

19-CV-9464 (KMK) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 15, 2021)