From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hartsfield v. Iowa Department of Corrections

United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Central Division
Sep 18, 2007
No. C06-3082-LRR (N.D. Iowa Sep. 18, 2007)

Opinion

No. C06-3082-LRR.

September 18, 2007


ORDER


This matter is before the court on its order dated July 27, 2007. In such order, the court, among other things, ordered the other plaintiffs, that is, all of the plaintiffs except Napoleon Hartsfield, to file an amended complaint that includes a specific statement detailing what each defendant did, or failed to do, which resulted in harm to him. It also indicated that, in the event that the court receives an amended complaint from any of the other plaintiffs, the court will direct the Clerk of Court to commence a separate action. Only Quinton Jenkins and Cortez Kellum complied with the court's order. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to file docket number 54 as a separate action and docket no. 55 as a separate action. Once those actions are filed, the court will determine whether it is appropriate to grant in forma pauperis status and/or conduct an initial review of Quinton Jenkins' amended complaint and Cortez Kellum's amended complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hartsfield v. Iowa Department of Corrections

United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Central Division
Sep 18, 2007
No. C06-3082-LRR (N.D. Iowa Sep. 18, 2007)
Case details for

Hartsfield v. Iowa Department of Corrections

Case Details

Full title:NAPOLEON HARTSFIELD, BOBBY SHELTON, AARON NIEHUS, CORTEZ KELLUM, GREGORY…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Central Division

Date published: Sep 18, 2007

Citations

No. C06-3082-LRR (N.D. Iowa Sep. 18, 2007)