Summary
In Hartnett, "service of an expert disclosure statement after the filing of the note of issue presented new and unanticipated claims" warranting relief.
Summary of this case from Surace v. MisseriOpinion
05-17-2016
William HARTNETT, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant, Black Seal Realty Corp., Defendant–Respondent.
LaRock & Perez, LLP, New York (Lawrence B. Goodman of counsel), for appellant. Fiden & Norris, LLP, New York (Austin Jacobson of counsel), for respondent.
LaRock & Perez, LLP, New York (Lawrence B. Goodman of counsel), for appellant.
Fiden & Norris, LLP, New York (Austin Jacobson of counsel), for respondent.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lynn R. Kotler, J.), entered April 15, 2015, which granted the motion of defendant Black Seal Realty Corp. (Black Seal) to compel plaintiff to appear for an orthopedic physical examination, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff's service of an expert disclosure statement after the filing of the note of issue presented new and unanticipated claims that plaintiff's ankle condition might warrant further aggressive medical intervention, including ankle fusion or ankle replacement procedures, resulting in appreciably greater medical and economic costs than initially alleged, as well as potentially greater disability and attendant restrictions on every day living. This constituted the requisite “unusual or unanticipated circumstances,” as well as “substantial prejudice,” needed to be shown to warrant the court, in a provident exercise of discretion, to grant of Black Seal's post-note of issue discovery request (see 22 NYCRR 202.21 [d]; CPLR 3101 [d][1][i]; Bermel v. Dagostino, 50 A.D.3d 303, 855 N.Y.S.2d 73 [1st Dept.2008] ; Esteva v. Catsimatidis, 4 A.D.3d 210, 772 N.Y.S.2d 267 [1st Dept.2004] ; Karakostas v. Avis Rent A Car Sys., 306 A.D.2d 381, 761 N.Y.S.2d 283 [2d Dept.2003] ).
MAZZARELLI, J.P., MOSKOWITZ, MANZANET–DANIELS, GESMER, JJ., concur.