Hartman Income Reit, Inc. v. Mackenzie Blue Ridge Fund III.

Full title: Hartman Income Reit, Inc. v. Mackenzie Blue Ridge Fund III, LP.

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston

Date published: Mar 17, 2022

No. 01-20-00218-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 17, 2022)

Opinion

01-20-00218-CV

03-17-2022

Hartman Income Reit, Inc. v. Mackenzie Blue Ridge Fund III, LP.

PETER KELLY JUDGE.

80th District Court of Harris County, Trial court case number: 2019-21776

PETER KELLY JUDGE.

Counsel for appellant filed a motion to substitute counsel on March 11, 2021, but the motion does not comply with the requirements of Rule 6.5 in that it fails to state or indicate that the motion was delivered to the appellant, either in person or by certified and first-class mail to the party (appellant). See Tex. R. App. P. 6.5(d), (b).

Accordingly, the motion to substitute counsel is denied without prejudice to refiling an amended motion in compliance with Rule 6.5.

It is so ORDERED.