From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hartley v. Mosley

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Jun 1, 2006
Case No. 2:03-CV-1229-WKW (M.D. Ala. Jun. 1, 2006)

Summary

noting that previous case filed by prisoner had been dismissed because "compelling a prisoner to walk in inclement weather did not constitute a violation of the Eighth Amendment"

Summary of this case from Santiago v. Whidden

Opinion

Case No. 2:03-CV-1229-WKW.

June 1, 2006


ORDER


The Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case (Doc. # 26) on May 2, 2006, finding that the defendant's motion for summary judgment is due to be granted. No objections were filed.

After an independent and de novo review of the record, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that:

1. The defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.

2. Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the defendant.

3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice.

An appropriate judgment will be entered.


Summaries of

Hartley v. Mosley

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Jun 1, 2006
Case No. 2:03-CV-1229-WKW (M.D. Ala. Jun. 1, 2006)

noting that previous case filed by prisoner had been dismissed because "compelling a prisoner to walk in inclement weather did not constitute a violation of the Eighth Amendment"

Summary of this case from Santiago v. Whidden
Case details for

Hartley v. Mosley

Case Details

Full title:REX HARTLEY, #133711, Plaintiff, v. GWENDOLYN MOSLEY, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division

Date published: Jun 1, 2006

Citations

Case No. 2:03-CV-1229-WKW (M.D. Ala. Jun. 1, 2006)

Citing Cases

Santiago v. Whidden

Other courts have determined that requiring inmates to walk among buildings in the rain is not a…