From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hartley v. McNeil

Supreme Court of Florida
May 26, 2009
11 So. 3d 942 (Fla. 2009)

Opinion

No. SC08-1517.

May 26, 2009.

Lower Tribunal No(s). 1D07-4408, 04-2006-CA-0271, 04-2006-CA-0339, 04-2006-CA-0433.


Petitioner has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus which has been treated as a petition for a writ of mandamus. Because petitioner has failed to show a clear legal right to the relief requested, he is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied.See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000). Pending motions are also denied.

PARIENTE, LEWIS, CANADY, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hartley v. McNeil

Supreme Court of Florida
May 26, 2009
11 So. 3d 942 (Fla. 2009)
Case details for

Hartley v. McNeil

Case Details

Full title:DREW CURTIS HARTLEY, Petitioner(s) v. WALTER A. McNEIL, ETC., Respondent(s)

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: May 26, 2009

Citations

11 So. 3d 942 (Fla. 2009)