3, 2003, Ballen, J.) (35 Conn. L. Rptr. 419, 421); see also Sharron v. USAA Casualty Ins. Co., Superior Court, judicial district of Hartford, Docket No. CV-97-047881-S (August 18, 1998, Gaffney, J.) (22 Conn. L. Rptr. 586) (reasoning that prohibition against subrogation under § 52-225c may be preempted by ERISA); Connecticut Steel Corp. v. Cordova, Superior Court, judicial district of New Haven, Docket No. CV-95-0248271-S (July 5, 1995, Gaffney, J.) (granting prejudgment remedy on grounds that ERISA preempts § 52-225c); Fuller v. First National Supermarkets, Superior Court, judicial district of Fairfield, Docket No. CV-91-0279444-S (March 17, 1994, Belinkie, J.) (11 Conn. L. Rptr. 285) (holding that Connecticut anti-subrogation law, § 52-225c, is preempted by ERISA); Hartford Hospital Medical Plan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., Superior Court, judicial district of Hartford, Docket No. CV-09-5030876-S (May 5, 2010, Hale, J.) (50 Conn. L. Rptr. 3) (holding that ERISA preempts Connecticut's anti-subrogation statute). Thus, " if the medical bills . . . were paid by an ERISA medical insurance plan, no collateral source reduction is permitted under [§ 52-225a]."