From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Maersk Line

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 10, 2021
18 CIVIL 121 (PKC) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 10, 2021)

Opinion

18 CIVIL 121 (PKC)

11-10-2021

HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE CO., as subrogor of Klearwall Industries, Inc., Plaintiff, v. MAERSK LINE, a division of the A.P. Moller-Maersk Group, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law dated November 10, 2021, The Court therefore concludes that Hartford has not established a prima facie case, and that even if it had, the evidence adduced at trial demonstrates by a preponderance of the evidence that the cargo was damaged by the insufficiency of package, and Hartford has not demonstrated a concurrent cause of loss in the fault and neglect of Maersk. The Court finds by a preponderance of evidence in favor of Maersk. Sapsan LLC and Albatrans, Inc. having been previously dismissed by the Court, Judgment is entered for all Defendants, and the case is closed.


Summaries of

Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Maersk Line

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 10, 2021
18 CIVIL 121 (PKC) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 10, 2021)
Case details for

Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Maersk Line

Case Details

Full title:HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE CO., as subrogor of Klearwall Industries, Inc.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Nov 10, 2021

Citations

18 CIVIL 121 (PKC) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 10, 2021)