Summary
determining that the plaintiff failed to state a breach of contract claim based on the university handbook's plagiarism provision because the plaintiff relied on the provision's existence without showing "how th[e] term has created an affirmative duty on the part of the University."
Summary of this case from David v. Neumann Univ.Opinion
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-CV-1576
03-26-2012
KRISTEN HART, Plaintiff, v. UNIVERSITY OF SCRANTON and GEORGE JONES, Defendants.
(JUDGE CAPUTO)
ORDER
NOW this 26th day of March, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 12) is GRANTED and Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Doc. 11) is DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this action as CLOSED.
__________________
A. Richard Caputo
United States District Judge