From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hart v. Tuolumne Fire District

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
May 20, 2013
1:11-CV-01271-LJO-SAB (E.D. Cal. May. 20, 2013)

Opinion

          SEIBERT & BAUTISTA, SHANNON SEIBERT (State Bar No. 240317), JOE BAUTISTA (State Bar No. 255708), Twain Harte, California Attorneys for Plaintiffs.

          MAYALL HURLEY, A Professional Corporation J. ANTHONY ABBOTT (State Bar No. 83975), JOHANNE C. MEDINA (State Bar No. 258973), Stockton, CA, Attorneys for Defendants.


          STIPULATION RE CONSOLIDATION OF PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITIONS TO DEFENDANT TFD'S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR ALTERNATIVELY, PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND HOCKETT'S, HUTCHINS', AND TURNER'S REPLIES TO PLAINTIFFS PREVIOUSLY FILED OPPOSITIONS

          LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, District Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND STIPULATED between Benjamin C. Oyarzo and Nicholas Hart, by and through their attorney, Shannon Seibert of Seibert & Bautista, and Defendants TFD, Joseph Turner, Darlene Hutchins, Kenneth Hockett, and Brian Machado, by and through their attorney, J. Anthony Abbott of Mayall Hurley, A Professional Corporation, as follows:

1. Defendants Kenneth Hockett, Darlene Hutchins, and Joseph Turner will file one consolidated Reply not to exceed 25 pages to Plaintiffs' Consolidated Opposition to Kenneth Hockett's, Darlene Hutchins', and Joseph Turner's Motions for Summary Judgment;

2. Plaintiffs Benjamin C. Oyarzo and Nicholas Hart will file one consolidated Opposition not to exceed 50 pages to Defendant TFD's Motions for Summary Judgment filed separately against each individual Plaintiff;

3. Plaintiffs will file one consolidated Response to the Separate Statements of Undisputed Facts filed by Defendant TFD against each individual Plaintiff;

4. All deadlines for filing of oppositions and replies remain as previously stipulated to by the parties and ordered by the Court.

          ORDER

         The stipulation of the parties having been considered, and good cause appearing therefor,

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hart v. Tuolumne Fire District

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
May 20, 2013
1:11-CV-01271-LJO-SAB (E.D. Cal. May. 20, 2013)
Case details for

Hart v. Tuolumne Fire District

Case Details

Full title:BENJAMIN C. OYARZO and NICHOLAS HART, Plaintiffs, v. TUOLUMNE FIRE…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: May 20, 2013

Citations

1:11-CV-01271-LJO-SAB (E.D. Cal. May. 20, 2013)