Summary
In Hart v. Naumburg (123 N.Y. 641) the defendants furnished an elevator and equipments "of the most approved kind and pattern," and this, together with the careful testing and inspection of it by the defendants and by the inspector of the elevator company, was held sufficient.
Summary of this case from Grifhahn v. KreizerOpinion
Argued October 7, 1890
Decided October 21, 1890
Joseph H. Choate for appellants.
Charles J. Patterson for respondent.
O'BRIEN, J., reads for reversal and new trial.
All concur, except RUGER, Ch. J., not voting.
Judgment reversed.