From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hart v. Commando

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle
Aug 29, 1983
570 F. Supp. 18 (W.D. Wash. 1983)

Opinion

No. C82-1230B.

August 29, 1983.

Dwight L. Guy, Seattle, Wash., for plaintiff.


O.S. Commando, pro se.


Plaintiff Hart sold the O/S COMMANDO to San Juan Pile Driving Company who executed a preferred ship mortgage on the vessel to secure the purchase price. Paul Appling, secretary-treasurer of San Juan, personally guaranteed payment of the loan. Hart subsequently filed this action to foreclose the mortgage, as a result of which judgment was entered and the vessel sold. Hart purchased the vessel upon his bid of $1.00. He now seeks a deficiency judgment against San Juan and Appling for the balance owing on the judgment plus costs, fees, and interest, in the total amount of $23,049.48.

It is well settled that a determination of the fairness of the sale price of a vessel at a public sale is left to the sound discretion of the District Court. J. Ray McDermott and Company, Inc. v. MORNING STAR, 457 F.2d 815 (5th Cir. 1972). The judicial sale price is not always conclusive and a fair value offset may be allowed against a deficiency when the equity of the circumstances requires it. Walter E. Heller and Company v. O/S SUNNY V, 595 F.2d 968 (5th Cir. 1979). The sale price here is so inadequate as to shock the conscience of this court. Accordingly, the deficiency judgment requested by plaintiff Hart is denied. Unless the parties can agree on or before September 30, 1983 to a fair and reasonable offset, the issue will be resolved by trial.


Summaries of

Hart v. Commando

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle
Aug 29, 1983
570 F. Supp. 18 (W.D. Wash. 1983)
Case details for

Hart v. Commando

Case Details

Full title:Grahame M. HART, Plaintiff, v. O.S. COMMANDO, OFF. NO. 209486, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle

Date published: Aug 29, 1983

Citations

570 F. Supp. 18 (W.D. Wash. 1983)

Citing Cases

Southern New England Production Credit Ass'n v. O/S My Marie

" Defendant MY MARIE, Inc.'s Memorandum, at 1. Counsel therein asks that the Court either allow a "fair value…

Pawtucket Credit Union v. M/Y Sea Rayna

Nevertheless, “[a] foreclosure sale may be set aside only if the inadequacy of the sales price is so gross as…