From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hart Cotton Mach. v. Graham Gin

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, El Paso
Feb 20, 1919
209 S.W. 269 (Tex. Civ. App. 1919)

Opinion

No. 935.

February 20, 1919.

Appeal from District Court, Young County; Wm. N. Bonner, Judge.

Action by the Hart Cotton Machine Company against the Graham Gin Company. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Appeal dismissed.

C. W. Johnson and Thos. G. Binkley, both of Graham, and Miller Miller, of Ft. Worth, for appellant.

Marshall King, of Graham, and Sil Stark, of Jacksboro, for appellee.


This action was instituted by the Hart Cotton Machine Company against the Graham Gin Company to recover the price of machinery sold and delivered, and judgment was rendered at the September term that plaintiff take nothing by its suit. Motion for new trial was overruled. Notice of appeal was given and entered, but it does not appear that the appeal bond was filed in time to give the Courts of Civil Appeals jurisdiction.

By Revised Civil Statutes 1911, art. 30, subd. 30, the county of Young is in the Thirtieth judicial district, and the term of court in said county is fixed at four weeks, beginning upon the first Mondays in March and September. The transcript shows that the term began September 3d, but does not show the date of adjournment; so, unless the term was extended by order of the court, and no such order appears, it must have adjourned September 29th. The appeal bond was filed October 26th, which is not within 20 days after adjournment as required by statute (Article 2084, Rev.St. 1911); therefore not filed in time to confer jurisdiction upon this court.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.


Summaries of

Hart Cotton Mach. v. Graham Gin

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, El Paso
Feb 20, 1919
209 S.W. 269 (Tex. Civ. App. 1919)
Case details for

Hart Cotton Mach. v. Graham Gin

Case Details

Full title:HART COTTON MACH. CO. v. GRAHAM GIN CO

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, El Paso

Date published: Feb 20, 1919

Citations

209 S.W. 269 (Tex. Civ. App. 1919)

Citing Cases

Loud v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.

(a) The trial court correctly ruled that an allowance was proper in this case. Kelly v. Nichols, 19 L.R.A.…