From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harshaw v. Boyd

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Mar 3, 2022
3:17-CV-479-TAV-DCP (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 3, 2022)

Opinion

3:17-CV-479-TAV-DCP

03-03-2022

RONNIE LAMONT HARSHAW, Petitioner, v. WARDEN BERT BOYD, Respondent.


JUDGMENT ORDER

THOMAS A. VARLAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

In accordance with the accompanying memorandum opinion, this prisoner's pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED and this action is DISMISSED. A certificate of appealability SHALL NOT issue. Because the Court has CERTIFIED in the memorandum opinion that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, should Petitioner file a notice of appeal, he is DENIED leave to appeal in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Fed. R. App. P. 24.

The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Harshaw v. Boyd

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Mar 3, 2022
3:17-CV-479-TAV-DCP (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 3, 2022)
Case details for

Harshaw v. Boyd

Case Details

Full title:RONNIE LAMONT HARSHAW, Petitioner, v. WARDEN BERT BOYD, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee

Date published: Mar 3, 2022

Citations

3:17-CV-479-TAV-DCP (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 3, 2022)