From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harrison v. Rambuski

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Sep 28, 1990
567 So. 2d 56 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 89-02375.

September 28, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; John S. Andrews, Judge.

Theodore J. Rechel of Law Offices of Michael B. Steeves, Clearwater, for appellant.

Dennis R. Pemberton of MacPherson, Harper, Kynes, Geller, Watson and Buford, P.A., Clearwater, for appellee.


We affirm the order dismissing the plaintiff's second amended complaint with prejudice and without leave to amend, but reverse the award of attorneys' fees to the defendant pursuant to section 57.105, Florida Statutes (1987). The trial court's order is deficient "because it contains no finding . . . regarding a complete absence of a justiciable issue." Whitten v. Progressive Casualty Ins. Co., 410 So.2d 501, 506 (Fla. 1982). On remand, the trial court may reimpose these fees only if it makes the necessary findings.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

RYDER, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Harrison v. Rambuski

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Sep 28, 1990
567 So. 2d 56 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Harrison v. Rambuski

Case Details

Full title:HERMAN HARRISON, APPELLANT, v. LYNN D. RAMBUSKI, D/B/A ACCURATE…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Sep 28, 1990

Citations

567 So. 2d 56 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

Mickler v. Graham

On remand, the trial court may reimpose those fees only if it makes the necessary findings based on the…

Broad and Cassel v. Newport Motel

We reverse the order under review on the cross appeal and remand for further proceedings upon a holding that…