From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harrison v. Madden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ANDERSON DIVISION
Feb 23, 2017
Civil Action No. 8:16-598-TMC (D.S.C. Feb. 23, 2017)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 8:16-598-TMC

02-23-2017

Greg Lamont Harrison, Plaintiff, v. Ricky W. Madden, Donchel Hill, Scott Russ, Matt Emery, and Greg Allison, Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Civil Rule 73.02, D.S.C., this matter was referred to a magistrate judge for pretrial handling. Before the court is the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation ("Report"), recommending that the court grant Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 30) or, in the alternative, dismiss the case without prejudice pursuant to Younger v. Harris. (ECF No. 50). Plaintiff was advised of his right to file objections to the Report. (ECF No. 50 at 14). However, Plaintiff filed no objections to the Report, and the time to do so has now run.

The Report has no presumptive weight and the responsibility to make a final determination in this matter remains with this court. See Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270-71 (1976). In the absence of objections, this court is not required to provide an explanation for adopting the Report. See Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983). Rather, "in the absence of a timely filed objection, a district court need not conduct a de novo review, but instead must only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation." Diamond v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 advisory committee's note).

After a thorough review of the Report and the record in this case, the court adopts the magistrate judge's Report (ECF No. 50) and incorporates it herein. It is therefore ORDERED that Defendants' motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 30) is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Timothy M. Cain

United States District Judge February 23, 2017
Anderson, South Carolina

NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL

The parties are hereby notified of the right to appeal this order pursuant to Rules 3 and 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.


Summaries of

Harrison v. Madden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ANDERSON DIVISION
Feb 23, 2017
Civil Action No. 8:16-598-TMC (D.S.C. Feb. 23, 2017)
Case details for

Harrison v. Madden

Case Details

Full title:Greg Lamont Harrison, Plaintiff, v. Ricky W. Madden, Donchel Hill, Scott…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ANDERSON DIVISION

Date published: Feb 23, 2017

Citations

Civil Action No. 8:16-598-TMC (D.S.C. Feb. 23, 2017)