From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harrison v. Linde

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 11, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-02000 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-02000 KJM CKD P

02-11-2013

CARL F. HARRISON, Plaintiff, v. SERGEANT LINDE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel (Dkt. No. 26) is denied.

________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8/kly
harr2000.31(2)


Summaries of

Harrison v. Linde

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 11, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-02000 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2013)
Case details for

Harrison v. Linde

Case Details

Full title:CARL F. HARRISON, Plaintiff, v. SERGEANT LINDE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 11, 2013

Citations

No. 2:12-cv-02000 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2013)