From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harrison v. Kumar

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Jun 2, 2021
4:21-cv-321-DPM (E.D. Ark. Jun. 2, 2021)

Opinion

4:21-cv-321-DPM

06-02-2021

JEFFREY HARRISON, PLAINTIFF v. AJAY KUMAR and SRAN TRANS, INC., DEFENDANTS


ORDER

D.P. Marshall Jr., United States District Judge

Harrison's attorneys, Kyle L. Mathis and W. Cagney McCormick, are not admitted to practice in this Court. Their motion to appear pro hue vice was denied without prejudice due to lack of local counsel. Unless an eligible attorney appears on Harrison's behalf by 17 June 2021, he will proceed pro se. In that event, Mr. Mathis and Mr. McCormick must provide the Clerk's Office with Harrison's complete contact information by that date.

So Ordered.


Summaries of

Harrison v. Kumar

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Jun 2, 2021
4:21-cv-321-DPM (E.D. Ark. Jun. 2, 2021)
Case details for

Harrison v. Kumar

Case Details

Full title:JEFFREY HARRISON, PLAINTIFF v. AJAY KUMAR and SRAN TRANS, INC., DEFENDANTS

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Jun 2, 2021

Citations

4:21-cv-321-DPM (E.D. Ark. Jun. 2, 2021)