From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harrison v. Kaner

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 23, 2024
23 Civ. 0944 (JHR) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 23, 2024)

Opinion

23 Civ. 0944 (JHR)

10-23-2024

HARRISON, Plaintiff, v. KANER et al, Defendants.


ORDER

JENNIFER H. REARDEN, District Judge:

To date, no counsel has appeared on behalf of Defendant Denefits LLC. Defendant is a corporate entity, and such entities “may appear in federal court only through a licensed attorney.” Lattanzio v. COMTA, 481 F.3d 137, 140 (2d Cir. 2007) (holding that corporate entities such as LLCs “must appear through licensed counsel”); see also Beyond Bespoke Tailors, Inc. v. Barchiesi, No. 20-CV-5482 (VSB), 2021 WL 10396899, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 22, 2021) (“[w]hile [the individual defendant] may proceed pro se, business entities such as [Defendant LLCs] may not”). Thus, Defendant cannot proceed pro se and is subject to default. Defendant shall file a notice of appearance via counsel by November 22, 2024. Failure to do so may result in the entry of a default judgment against Defendant.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Harrison v. Kaner

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 23, 2024
23 Civ. 0944 (JHR) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 23, 2024)
Case details for

Harrison v. Kaner

Case Details

Full title:HARRISON, Plaintiff, v. KANER et al, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Oct 23, 2024

Citations

23 Civ. 0944 (JHR) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 23, 2024)