From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harrison v. Bryan

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1908
62 S.E. 305 (N.C. 1908)

Opinion

(Filed 16 September, 1908.)

Injunction — Cause of Action Removed — Appeal Dismissed Without Prejudice.

When it has been made to appear that the action is for injunctive relief only, and the cause has been removed, appeal will be dismissed without prejudice to the rights of plaintiff to sue for damages, if so desired.

ACTION to enjoin the cutting and removing of a tree, heard before Guion, J., at Fall Term, 1908, of CRAVEN.

D. E. Hendren and G. V. Cooper for plaintiff.

W. W. Clark and W. D. McIver for defendants.


Plaintiff appealed.


It appearing to the Court, upon affidavit of defendant, which is not contradicted, that since the dissolution of the restraining order in this case by his Honor, Judge Guion, and pending this appeal, the tree described in the pleading has been cut down by the city authorities of New Bern, and that there is nothing now to enjoin, and this being an action for injunctive relief only, it is ordered that the action be dismissed without prejudice to any rights the plaintiff may have to commence another action for damages, if so desired.

Action Dismissed.

Cited: Wallace v. Wilkesboro, 151 N.C. 615; Moore v. Monument Co., 166 N.C. 212; Kilpatrick v. Harvey, 170 N.C. 668; In re Parker, 177 N.C. 468.

(316)


Summaries of

Harrison v. Bryan

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1908
62 S.E. 305 (N.C. 1908)
Case details for

Harrison v. Bryan

Case Details

Full title:MARY H. HARRISON v. J. A. BRYAN AND THE CITY OF NEW BERN ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Sep 1, 1908

Citations

62 S.E. 305 (N.C. 1908)
148 N.C. 315

Citing Cases

Tobacco Growers Association v. Pollock

However this may be as to the present crop, even if we should consider the affidavit made by the president of…

State v. Scott

But without the aid of this principle and the authorities sustaining it, we hold that the injunction should…