holding that agent who sold insurance policy is not an indispensable party because "[n]o independent basis of liability is asserted against it" and the remaining parties may obtain complete relief without agent's presence and otherwise would not suffer any prejudice
Summary of this case from Second State Enters., Inc. v. Mid-Atlantic Invs., LLCNo. 84-5821.
June 28, 1985.
M.D.Pa., 596 F.Supp. 954.
AFFIRMED
holding that agent who sold insurance policy is not an indispensable party because "[n]o independent basis of liability is asserted against it" and the remaining parties may obtain complete relief without agent's presence and otherwise would not suffer any prejudice
Summary of this case from Second State Enters., Inc. v. Mid-Atlantic Invs., LLCholding thatBrakeman notice-prejudice rule does not apply to claims-made policies
Summary of this case from Women's Christian Alliance v. Executive Risk Indem., Inc.stating that the notice provision in a "claims made" policy serves a materially different purpose than that of an "occurrence" policy and, under Pennsylvania law, "claims made" coverage exists only when claims are timely reported
Summary of this case from Westport Insurance Corporation v. Mirskygiving an extension of reporting time after policy expiration rewrites the contract between the parties
Summary of this case from Textron, Inc. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.Full title:City of Harrisburg v. International Surplus Lines Ins. Co
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Date published: Jun 28, 1985
Given this fact, excusing Textron's delay would alter a fundamental term of the policy in respect to property…
Women's Christian Alliance v. Executive Risk Indem., Inc.rakeman `notice-prejudice' rule does not apply to `claims made policies'."); Borish v. Britamco Underwriters,…