From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Warden, Chillicothe Corr. Inst.

United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio
Mar 3, 2023
3:15-cv-179 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 3, 2023)

Opinion

3:15-cv-179

03-03-2023

RONALD HARRIS II, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Chillicothe Correctional Institution, Respondent.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Thomas M. Rose, United States District Judge

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (ECF No. 18) to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Petitioner's “Motion to Enter 28 USCS & 2347 & 1338” (ECF No. 17) is DENIED.


Summaries of

Harris v. Warden, Chillicothe Corr. Inst.

United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio
Mar 3, 2023
3:15-cv-179 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 3, 2023)
Case details for

Harris v. Warden, Chillicothe Corr. Inst.

Case Details

Full title:RONALD HARRIS II, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Chillicothe Correctional…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio

Date published: Mar 3, 2023

Citations

3:15-cv-179 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 3, 2023)