From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Warden, Chillicothe Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Jan 14, 2013
Case No. 3:12-cv-410 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 14, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:12-cv-410

01-14-2013

RONALD E. HARRIS, II, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Chillicothe Correctional Institution, Respondent.


District Judge Walter Herbert Rice

Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz


DECISION AND ORDER

This habeas corpus case is before the Court on Petitioner's "Motion Requesting To Transfer in the Record and Copy of Record" (Doc. No. 6). The Motion is DENIED.

Taken as a whole, the Motion is unintelligible to the Court. If Petitioner is requesting that the state court record in this case be filed here, that would only occur if the Court ordered an answer to the Petition. At present, the Magistrate Judge has recommended that the Petition be dismissed as a second or successive petition, in light of the final judgment in our Case No. 3:09-cv-060. If, as might be the case, Petitioner is seeking to have transferred to this Court the records in a number of other courts he mentioned, that would be improper in a habeas corpus case.

Michael R. Merz

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Harris v. Warden, Chillicothe Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Jan 14, 2013
Case No. 3:12-cv-410 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 14, 2013)
Case details for

Harris v. Warden, Chillicothe Corr. Inst.

Case Details

Full title:RONALD E. HARRIS, II, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Chillicothe Correctional…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Jan 14, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:12-cv-410 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 14, 2013)