From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Uribe

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
May 28, 2013
2:12-cv-01502-AC (E.D. Cal. May. 28, 2013)

Opinion

          William L. Schmidt, Esq. SBN 206870, WILLIAM L. SCHMIDT, ATTORNEY AT LAW, P.C., Fresno, CA, Attorney for Plaintiff, WAYDE HOLLIS HARRIS.

          EMRY J. ALLEN, ATTORNEY AT LAW, Emry J. Allen, Attorney for Plaintiff Wayde Hollis Harris.


          NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY [PROPOSED]

          ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.

         TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD HEREIN:

         PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, Wayde Hollis Harris substitutes Emry J. Allen, as counsel of record in place of William L. Schmidt

         Contact information for new counsel is as follows:

         I, Wayde Hollis Harris, Plaintiff in the above-captioned action hereby acknowledge and consent to the above substitution.

         I, William L. Schmidt., consent to being substituted.

         I, Emry J. Allen, consent to the above substitution.

         The substitution of attorney is hereby approved and so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Harris v. Uribe

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
May 28, 2013
2:12-cv-01502-AC (E.D. Cal. May. 28, 2013)
Case details for

Harris v. Uribe

Case Details

Full title:WAYDE HOLLIS HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. DOMINGO URIBE, JR., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: May 28, 2013

Citations

2:12-cv-01502-AC (E.D. Cal. May. 28, 2013)