From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Oct 26, 2012
106 So. 3d 937 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

Nos. 2D12–4292 2D12–4680.

2012-10-26

Marcus B. HARRIS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE Of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).


BY ORDER OF THE COURT.

As it appears that the proceedings in the circuit court relative to the petitioner's motion for postconviction relief are progressing, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. Cf. Munn v. Fla. Parole Comm'n., 807 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). This denial is without prejudice to the petitioner to file a new petition for writ of mandamus if the postconviction court has not entered a final order on the motion within 90 days of the date of this order, provided that the petitioner is unrepresented by counsel in the postconviction proceeding.

SILBERMAN, C.J., and NORTHCUTT and KELLY, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Harris v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Oct 26, 2012
106 So. 3d 937 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Harris v. State

Case Details

Full title:Marcus B. HARRIS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE Of Florida…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Date published: Oct 26, 2012

Citations

106 So. 3d 937 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)