From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five
Apr 6, 2004
131 S.W.3d 853 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004)

Opinion

No. ED 82460

April 6, 2004

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Honorable Evelyn Baker.

Amanda R. Schehr, St. Louis, Missouri, for Appellant.

Andrea Kaye Spillars, Jefferson City, Missouri, for Respondent.

Before Sherri B. Sullivan, C.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Sr., J., and George W. Draper III, J.



ORDER


Rodney Harris (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant contends he entered his guilty plea to first-degree robbery unknowingly because his counsel failed to inform him that he would be required to serve 85 percent of the prison term before becoming eligible for parole.

All rule references are to Mo. R. Crim. P. 2003, unless otherwise indicated.

Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Harris v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five
Apr 6, 2004
131 S.W.3d 853 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004)
Case details for

Harris v. State

Case Details

Full title:RODNEY HARRIS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five

Date published: Apr 6, 2004

Citations

131 S.W.3d 853 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004)