From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 30, 2002
829 So. 2d 328 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Summary

affirming the denial of a petition for writ of coram nobis as untimely filed

Summary of this case from Medina v. State

Opinion

Case No. 3D01-3073

Opinion filed October 30, 2002.

An Appeal under Fla.R.App.P.9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court of Miami-Dade County, Cecilia M. Altonaga, Judge. Lower Tribunal No. 80-2058.

Robert Harris, in proper person. Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and RAMIREZ, J., and NESBITT, Senior Judge.


We affirm the denial of Robert Harris' petition as untimely filed. Even though Harris labeled his petition as one for writ of error coram nobis, all of his allegations pertain to ineffective assistance of counsel in connection with pleas entered on December 8, 1980, and March 21, 1987. The proper pleading which Harris should have filed was a motion under rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The trial court, therefore, properly denied the petition as untimely. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850(b).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Harris v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 30, 2002
829 So. 2d 328 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

affirming the denial of a petition for writ of coram nobis as untimely filed

Summary of this case from Medina v. State

In Harris, The court held that "even though Harris labeled his petition as one for writ of error coram nobis, all of his allegations pertain to ineffective assistance of counsel in connection with pleas entered on December 8, 1987.

Summary of this case from Medina v. State
Case details for

Harris v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT HARRIS, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Oct 30, 2002

Citations

829 So. 2d 328 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Citing Cases

Medina v. State

Id. at 352 citing to Howarth v. State, 673 So.2d at 582. See also Harris v. State, 829 So.2d 328 (Fla. 3d DCA…

Howarth v. State

Claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are not errors of fact that are cognizable in a traditional…