From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Sexton

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Mar 9, 2023
1:18-cv-0080 KJM DB P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 9, 2023)

Opinion

1:18-cv-0080 KJM DB P

03-09-2023

EARNEST S. HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. SEXTON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

DEBOFAH BARNES, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges defendants' use of the Guard One welfare check system violated his rights under the Eighth Amendment. In an order filed January 17, 2023, Chief Judge Mueller granted in part and denied in part plaintiff's February 18, 2021 motion to amend the second amended complaint. On May 6, 2022, plaintiff filed another motion to amend the complaint. Defendants will be ordered to file a response.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. Within thirty days of the filed date of this order, defendants shall file a response to plaintiff's May 6, 2022 motion to amend; and
2. Within twenty days after he is served with defendants' response, plaintiff may file a reply.


Summaries of

Harris v. Sexton

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Mar 9, 2023
1:18-cv-0080 KJM DB P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 9, 2023)
Case details for

Harris v. Sexton

Case Details

Full title:EARNEST S. HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. SEXTON, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Mar 9, 2023

Citations

1:18-cv-0080 KJM DB P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 9, 2023)