From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Potomac Edison Company

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jul 10, 1970
429 F.2d 248 (4th Cir. 1970)

Opinion

Nos. 14074, 14075.

Argued June 4, 1970.

Decided July 10, 1970.

Gerald Herz, Washington, D.C. (Philip J. Lesser, I. Irwin Bolotin, and Lesser Lesser, Washington, D.C., on brief), for Willie A. Harris and Anita Harris.

Herbert F. Murray, Baltimore, Md. (Michael A. Pretl and Smith, Somerville Case, Baltimore, Md., on brief), for The Potomac Edison Co.

Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, BRYAN, Circuit Judge, and WIDENER, District Judge.


For the reasons stated by the District Court we accept its finding that the plaintiff was contributorily negligent when he came in contact with the hot, electric power line. There is an adequate basis in the record for the finding, so that its acceptance is compelled. F.R. Civ.P. Rule 52.

Accordingly, entry of judgment for the defendant was appropriate.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Harris v. Potomac Edison Company

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jul 10, 1970
429 F.2d 248 (4th Cir. 1970)
Case details for

Harris v. Potomac Edison Company

Case Details

Full title:Willie A. HARRIS and Anita Harris, Appellants, v. The POTOMAC EDISON…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jul 10, 1970

Citations

429 F.2d 248 (4th Cir. 1970)

Citing Cases

Jarboe v. Astrue

Jarboe is a pro se litigant and therefore the Court must liberally construe his pleadings. Spotts v. United…