From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. McKinney

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Apr 2, 2015
Appellate Case No. 2014-001721 (S.C. Ct. App. Apr. 2, 2015)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2014-001721 Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-180

04-02-2015

Brian & Candi Harris, Respondents, v. Lauren McKinney, Tyrone Jerry, Catawba Indian Nation, and South Carolina Department of Social Services, Defendants, Of whom Tyrone Jerry is the Appellant. In the interest of a minor child under the age of eighteen.

Christopher Charles Johnson, of Nimmons & Malchow, P.C., of Augusta, GA, for Appellant. Brian Austin Katonak, of the Law Office of Brian Katonak, PA, of Aiken, Respondents.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. Appeal From Aiken County
Gordon B. Jenkinson, Family Court Judge

AFFIRMED

Christopher Charles Johnson, of Nimmons & Malchow, P.C., of Augusta, GA, for Appellant. Brian Austin Katonak, of the Law Office of Brian Katonak, PA, of Aiken, Respondents. PER CURIAM: Tyrone Jerry appeals the family court's final order terminating his parental rights to his minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2014). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of facts and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling. AFFIRMED. FEW, C.J., and HUFF and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.


Summaries of

Harris v. McKinney

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Apr 2, 2015
Appellate Case No. 2014-001721 (S.C. Ct. App. Apr. 2, 2015)
Case details for

Harris v. McKinney

Case Details

Full title:Brian & Candi Harris, Respondents, v. Lauren McKinney, Tyrone Jerry…

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Apr 2, 2015

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2014-001721 (S.C. Ct. App. Apr. 2, 2015)