From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Kelly

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Jun 4, 2014
Case No. 3:11cv00155 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 4, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 3:11cv00155

06-04-2014

RONALD E. HARRIS, II, Plaintiff, v. SHERIFF GENE KELLY, et al., Defendants.


District Judge Thomas M. Rose

Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington


DECISION AND ENTRY

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of Chief United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. #15), to whom this case was originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendations filed on May 8, 2014 (Doc. #15) is ADOPTED in full;
2. Plaintiff Ronald E. Harris, II's filing titled "DENOVO REVIEW OF THE RECORD" (Doc. #14) is DENIED;
3. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(3) that for the foregoing reasons an appeal of this Decision and Entry would not be taken in good faith, and consequently, leave for Plaintiff to appeal in forma pauperis is denied; and,
4. The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court.

__________

Thomas M. Rose

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Harris v. Kelly

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Jun 4, 2014
Case No. 3:11cv00155 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 4, 2014)
Case details for

Harris v. Kelly

Case Details

Full title:RONALD E. HARRIS, II, Plaintiff, v. SHERIFF GENE KELLY, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Jun 4, 2014

Citations

Case No. 3:11cv00155 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 4, 2014)