From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Hulihan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Oct 23, 2012
No. 11 Civ. 3019 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 23, 2012)

Opinion

No. 11 Civ. 3019 (RA)

10-23-2012

DARRYL HARRIS, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM HULIHAN, SUPT., Respondent.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge:

The Court hereby adopts the thoughtful and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Dolinger, dated August 8, 2012, to which no objection has been filed. Accordingly, the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied and the action is dismissed with prejudice.

The parties' failure to file written objections, after Magistrate Judge Dolinger warned that such failure may constitute a waiver of those objections, precludes appellate review of this decision. See Caidor v. Onondaga County, 517 F.3d 601, 604 (2d Cir. 2008). SO ORDERED. Dated: October 23, 2012

New York, New York

_________________

Ronnie Abrams

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Harris v. Hulihan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Oct 23, 2012
No. 11 Civ. 3019 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 23, 2012)
Case details for

Harris v. Hulihan

Case Details

Full title:DARRYL HARRIS, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM HULIHAN, SUPT., Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Oct 23, 2012

Citations

No. 11 Civ. 3019 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 23, 2012)