From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Hawkins

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 4, 2013
No. 2: 12-cv-3067 JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2: 12-cv-3067 JFM (PC)

03-04-2013

MILTON DEXTER HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. HAWKINS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

By order dated February 26, 2013, this action was dismissed without prejudice and judgment was entered because plaintiff had not yet filed an amended complaint within the previously specified period. (See Dkt. No 14.) However, after that order was signed, but before being entered on the docket by the Clerk, plaintiff's first amended complaint was entered on the court's docket. (See Dkt. No. 13.) The first amended complaint is dated February 15, 2013, which is within the period of time upon which plaintiff had to file his first amended complaint.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the order and judgment (Dkt. Nos. 14 & 15.) are VACATED and this matter is reopened. Plaintiff's amended complaint will be screened in due course.

______________________

DALE A. DROZD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Harris v. Hawkins

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 4, 2013
No. 2: 12-cv-3067 JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2013)
Case details for

Harris v. Hawkins

Case Details

Full title:MILTON DEXTER HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. HAWKINS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 4, 2013

Citations

No. 2: 12-cv-3067 JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2013)