From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Hawkins

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 24, 2013
No. 2: 12-cv-3067 JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2: 12-cv-3067 JFM (PC)

01-24-2013

MILTON DEXTER HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. HAWKINS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 18, 2013, the court screened the complaint. The complaint was dismissed but plaintiff was given leave to file an amended complaint.

On January 8, 2013, plaintiff filed a motion to correct an error in his original complaint. In that motion, plaintiff stated that the address of one of the named defendants was incorrect. In light of the fact that plaintiff's original complaint has been dismissed with leave to amend, plaintiff will be able to correct the order when he prepares his amended complaint. His motion to correct the original complaint is not necessary, and his motion to correct the order will be denied as unnecessary.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to correct an error (Dkt. No. 5.) is DENIED AS MOOT.

_____________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Harris v. Hawkins

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 24, 2013
No. 2: 12-cv-3067 JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2013)
Case details for

Harris v. Hawkins

Case Details

Full title:MILTON DEXTER HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. HAWKINS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 24, 2013

Citations

No. 2: 12-cv-3067 JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2013)