From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Fasish

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 10, 2024
21-cv-00283-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2024)

Opinion

21-cv-00283-HSG

01-10-2024

MAURICE LYDELL HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. CLERIC MUHAMMAD K. FASISH, et al., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTION

RE: DKT. NO. 37

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Good cause being shown, Defendants' request for an extension of time to file their dispositive motion is GRANTED. Dkt. No. 37. Defendants shall file their dispositive motion by March 26, 2024. Plaintiff's opposition to the dispositive motion must be filed with the Court and served upon Defendants no later than 28 days from the date the motion is filed. Defendants shall file a reply brief in support of their dispositive motion no later than 14 days after the date the opposition is filed. The motion shall be deemed submitted as of the date the reply brief is due. No hearing will be held on the motion.

This order terminates Dkt. No. 37.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Harris v. Fasish

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 10, 2024
21-cv-00283-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2024)
Case details for

Harris v. Fasish

Case Details

Full title:MAURICE LYDELL HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. CLERIC MUHAMMAD K. FASISH, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jan 10, 2024

Citations

21-cv-00283-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2024)