From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Evans

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 20, 1992
186 A.D.2d 454 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

October 20, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Charles E. Ramos, J.).


We find that the IAS Court did not abuse its discretion in conditionally granting the order of preclusion upon payment of a monetary sanction by plaintiff's counsel where the plaintiff's approximately three week delay in timely complying with the conditional order of preclusion was implicitly found by the court to be neither willful, deliberate or contumacious (see, Scanlon v Rhodes School, 76 A.D.2d 813; Grace v Grace, 74 A.D.2d 896).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Milonas, Rosenberger, Ross and Asch, JJ.


Summaries of

Harris v. Evans

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 20, 1992
186 A.D.2d 454 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Harris v. Evans

Case Details

Full title:DUANE HARRIS, Respondent, v. THOMAS EVANS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 20, 1992

Citations

186 A.D.2d 454 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
588 N.Y.S.2d 562

Citing Cases

Univ. Neurology, P.C. v. Travelers Indem. Ins.

PER CURIAM: Civil Court did not abuse its discretion in granting a conditional order of dismissal where…