From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Diguglielmo

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 22, 2007
Civil Action No. 07-213 (W.D. Pa. Oct. 22, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 07-213.

October 22, 2007


ORDER


AND NOW, this 22nd day of Oct, 2007, after the Petitioner, George Lester Harris, filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties ten days after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and objections having been filed by counsel for the Petitioner, and upon independent review of the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Habeas Petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if the parties desire to appeal from this Order they must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed.R.App.P.


Summaries of

Harris v. Diguglielmo

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 22, 2007
Civil Action No. 07-213 (W.D. Pa. Oct. 22, 2007)
Case details for

Harris v. Diguglielmo

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE LESTER HARRIS, Petitioner v. DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, Superintendent…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 22, 2007

Citations

Civil Action No. 07-213 (W.D. Pa. Oct. 22, 2007)

Citing Cases

Settles v. Lafler

Thus, the Michigan Court of Appeal's analysis, which included a review for prejudice, was not "contrary to"…

Lindensmith v. Berghuis

The Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit and several district courts have held that Gonzalez-Lopez is not…