From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. De Blasio

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 14, 2021
21-CV-7304 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 14, 2021)

Opinion

21-CV-7304 (LTS)

10-14-2021

DERRICK HARRIS, CEO OF DEFENDERS OF DUE PROCESS FOUNDATION, INC., Plaintiff, v. MAYOR BILL DE BLASIO; CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

By order dated September 3, 2021, the Court directed Plaintiff, within thirty days, to submit a completed and signed request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP application”) or pay the $402.00 in fees required to file a civil action in this Court. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint. Plaintiff has not filed an IFP application or paid the fees. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915.

The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue).

The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket.

SO ORDERED. 1


Summaries of

Harris v. De Blasio

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 14, 2021
21-CV-7304 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 14, 2021)
Case details for

Harris v. De Blasio

Case Details

Full title:DERRICK HARRIS, CEO OF DEFENDERS OF DUE PROCESS FOUNDATION, INC.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Oct 14, 2021

Citations

21-CV-7304 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 14, 2021)