From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Feb 25, 1930
25 S.W.2d 369 (Ky. Ct. App. 1930)

Opinion

Decided February 25, 1930.

Appeal from Metcalfe Circuit Court.

A.J. THOMPSON, G.B. STONE, R.L. SMITH and E.C. TERRY for appellant.

J.W. CAMMACK, Attorney General, and SAMUEL B. KIRBY, JR., Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


Affirming.

Appellant was indicted charged with the offense of false swearing, and upon his trial he was convicted and sentenced to serve two years in the penitentiary. He has appealed without a bill of exceptions. The only thing before the court is the sufficiency of the indictment. His only complaint is that the indictment is defective in that it fails to allege that the accused was sworn by an officer authorized to administer an oath. The allegation in the indictment is that he was sworn by the foreman of the grand jury then in session which had been legally impaneled. Section 106 of the Criminal Code of Practice contains specific authority for the swearing of a witness by the foreman of a grand jury. Under the authority of Allison v. Com., 227 Ky. 557, 13 S.W.2d 769, the indictment was sufficient.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Harris v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Feb 25, 1930
25 S.W.2d 369 (Ky. Ct. App. 1930)
Case details for

Harris v. Commonwealth

Case Details

Full title:Harris v. Commonwealth

Court:Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Date published: Feb 25, 1930

Citations

25 S.W.2d 369 (Ky. Ct. App. 1930)
233 Ky. 198