From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 18, 2013
11-CV-1497 (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 18, 2013)

Summary

finding the ALJ did not satisfy the duty to develop the record where the ALJ held the record open to allow the plaintiff's counsel to obtain the promised additional records but no records were submitted

Summary of this case from Corona v. Berryhill

Opinion

11-CV-1497

2013-09-18

ARTEISHA HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

OLINSKY LAW GROUP Attorneys for Plaintiff OFFICE OF REGIONAL GENERAL COUNSEL Attorneys for Defendant Social Security Administration Region II OF COUNSEL: BRANDON W. SAWYER, ESQ. HOWARD D. OLINSKY, ESQ. VERNON NORWOOD, ESQ.


APPEARANCES: OLINSKY LAW GROUP
Attorneys for Plaintiff
OFFICE OF REGIONAL GENERAL
COUNSEL
Attorneys for Defendant
Social Security Administration
Region II
OF COUNSEL: BRANDON W. SAWYER, ESQ. HOWARD D. OLINSKY, ESQ. VERNON NORWOOD, ESQ. DAVID N. HURD
United States District Judge

DECISION and ORDER

Plaintiff Arteisha Harris filed this action seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her application for child's insurance benefits and Supplemental Security Income benefits under the Social Security Act. By Report-Recommendation dated May 2, 2013, the Honorable Victor E. Bianchini, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that the Commissioner's motion for judgment on the pleadings be denied, plaintiff's motion be granted, and this case be remanded for further proceedings. No objections to the Report-Recommendation were filed.

Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that

1. The Commissioner's motion is DENIED;

2. Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED; and

3. The decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED, and this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) for further administrative proceedings consistent with this Report-Recommendation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________________

United States District Judge
Dated: September 18, 2013

Utica, New York.


Summaries of

Harris v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 18, 2013
11-CV-1497 (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 18, 2013)

finding the ALJ did not satisfy the duty to develop the record where the ALJ held the record open to allow the plaintiff's counsel to obtain the promised additional records but no records were submitted

Summary of this case from Corona v. Berryhill

noting conflicting case law within Second Circuit as to whether the ALJ can satisfy his duty to develop the record by relying on counsel to obtain records

Summary of this case from Davis v. Colvin
Case details for

Harris v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:ARTEISHA HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Sep 18, 2013

Citations

11-CV-1497 (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 18, 2013)

Citing Cases

Sotososa v. Colvin

Where there is a gap in the record, however, district courts in this circuit have reached conflicting…

Sheila W. v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

The representative's inaccurate characterization of the record does not eliminate the ALJ's own obligation to…