From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Clark Cnty. Det. Ctr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 1, 2013
2:12-cv-00144-JCM-PAL (D. Nev. Mar. 1, 2013)

Opinion

2:12-cv-00144-JCM-PAL

03-01-2013

CHARLES B. HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. CLARK COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, et al. Defendants.


ORDER

In this pro se prisoner action, the court dismissed plaintiff's federal claims with leave to amend. Plaintiff thereafter did not timely submit an amended complaint asserting viable federal claims. Following upon the dismissal of all federal claims over which the district court had original jurisdiction, the court finds that the interests of judicial economy, convenience, fairness and comity would be best served in this case by dismissing the state law claims that remain without prejudice. Substantial time remains in the two-year statute of limitations at the time of the dismissal. The court accordingly exercises its discretion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3) to decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims.

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that all remaining claims are DISMISSED without prejudice.

The clerk of court shall enter final judgment accordingly, dismissing this action without prejudice.

____________________

JAMES C. MAHAN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Harris v. Clark Cnty. Det. Ctr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 1, 2013
2:12-cv-00144-JCM-PAL (D. Nev. Mar. 1, 2013)
Case details for

Harris v. Clark Cnty. Det. Ctr.

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES B. HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. CLARK COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, et al…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Mar 1, 2013

Citations

2:12-cv-00144-JCM-PAL (D. Nev. Mar. 1, 2013)