From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Cal. Forensic Med. Grp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 28, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-2966 KJM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-2966 KJM KJN P

02-28-2013

ANTOINE W. HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA FORENSIC MEDICAL GROUP, Defendant.


FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed December 18, 2012, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. On January 16, 2013, plaintiff was granted an additional thirty days in which to file an amended complaint. Thirty days from that date have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

______________________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Harris v. Cal. Forensic Med. Grp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 28, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-2966 KJM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2013)
Case details for

Harris v. Cal. Forensic Med. Grp.

Case Details

Full title:ANTOINE W. HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA FORENSIC MEDICAL GROUP…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 28, 2013

Citations

No. 2:12-cv-2966 KJM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2013)