From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Bear Valley Cmty. Servs. Dist.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 15, 2013
Case No.: 1:12-cv-01664-LJO-JLT (E.D. Cal. Mar. 15, 2013)

Opinion

Case No.: 1:12-cv-01664-LJO-JLT

03-15-2013

KAREN JANE HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. BEAR VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT; BEAR VALLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT; CHIEF OF POLICE TERRY FREEMAN; SERGEANT JOSHUA MOTLEY; SERGEANT DAVID WATTS; OFFICER RODNEY WALTHERS; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants.

JOHN R. SZEWCZYK, ESQ. - SBN 109981 CLIFFORD & BROWN, A Professional Corporation Attorneys for defendant BEAR VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT


JOHN R. SZEWCZYK, ESQ. - SBN 109981
CLIFFORD & BROWN, A Professional Corporation
Attorneys for defendant BEAR VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT

ORDER RE STIPULATION ON

CONTINUED DATES FOR INITIAL

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE,

FILING PLEADINGS IN RESPONSE TO

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND

FILING OF "SLAPP" MOTION


ORDER

Based upon the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing,

IT IS ORDERED that dates for the filing of responsive pleadings, certain additional motions, and that the date for the Initial Scheduling Conference shall be changed as follows:

a. That all parties will engage in voluntary mediation which must be completed no later than June 7, 2013, if not sooner;

b. That any responsive pleadings which Defendants choose to file in response to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint shall be due 30 days after the completion of voluntary mediation efforts undertaken by all parties;

c. That should Defendants choose to file "SLAPP" Motions in accordance with California Code of Civil Procedure Section 425.16 et.seq. in conjunction with any of the claims set forth by Plaintiff in her First Amended Complaint, said Motions must be filed within 60 days after the completion of voluntary mediation efforts undertaken by all parties;

d. That the Initial Case Scheduling Conference presently set for March 28, 2013 at 8:30 a.m. shall be continued to August 13, 2013; and,

e. That all parties shall not be required to exchange any and all Rule 26 Initial Disclosures until the date set by the Court at the time of the Initial Case Scheduling Conference. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Jennifer L. Thurston

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Harris v. Bear Valley Cmty. Servs. Dist.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 15, 2013
Case No.: 1:12-cv-01664-LJO-JLT (E.D. Cal. Mar. 15, 2013)
Case details for

Harris v. Bear Valley Cmty. Servs. Dist.

Case Details

Full title:KAREN JANE HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. BEAR VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 15, 2013

Citations

Case No.: 1:12-cv-01664-LJO-JLT (E.D. Cal. Mar. 15, 2013)