From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harrell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Nov 8, 2017
229 So. 3d 849 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

Opinion

No. 4D17–1840

11-08-2017

Jesse Cleveland HARRELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Jesse Cleveland Harrell, Cross City, pro se. No brief filed for appellee.


Jesse Cleveland Harrell, Cross City, pro se.

No brief filed for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Jesse Cleveland Harrell timely appeals the summary denial of a rule 3.850 motion. Below the state responded that Harrell's August 5, 2016, motion was untimely filed under rule 3.850 and his claims of scoresheet error did not demonstrate entitlement to relief under rule 3.800(a). The trial court denied the motion based upon the state's response.

On appeal, the state acknowledges that the August 2016 motion was timely filed within two years after the Florida Supreme Court declined jurisdiction to review Harrell's direct appeal in Harrell v. State, 173 So.3d 962 (Fla. 2015). See, e.g., Leighty v. State, 87 So.3d 1262 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). Accordingly, we reverse the trial court's order and remand for the court to reconsider whether appellant is entitled to relief under rule 3.850.

Gross, Taylor and May, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Harrell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Nov 8, 2017
229 So. 3d 849 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)
Case details for

Harrell v. State

Case Details

Full title:Jesse Cleveland HARRELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Date published: Nov 8, 2017

Citations

229 So. 3d 849 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)