From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harrell v. Sellars

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jan 19, 1983
424 So. 2d 881 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Summary

noting that Defendant who "had control over the vehicle," "maintained and stored it," and "had it available for his regular use" was properly considered the vehicle's beneficial owner even though legal title remained in another

Summary of this case from LM Ins. Corp. v. Occidental Fire & Cas. Co.

Opinion

No. AH-443.

December 17, 1982. Rehearing Denied January 19, 1983.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Leon County, John A. Rudd, J.

P. Kevin Davey of Douglass, Davey Cooper, Tallahassee, for appellants.

David W. Spicer of McFarlain, Bobo, Sternstein, Wiley Cassedy, Tallahassee, Ronald E. Cabaniss and Lori J. Caldwell of Rumberger, Kirk, Caldwell Cabaniss, Orlando, Jon D. Caminez and Paul D. Srygley, Tallahassee, for appellees.


Harrell appeals and Sellars cross-appeals a judgment following a nonjury trial. The trial court found that Sellars was the beneficial owner of a 1973 Pinto and entered judgment in favor of the defendants, Capital City First National Bank, its insurer, and Safeco. We affirm.

This litigation arose from an accident involving the Pinto driven by Barbara Jean Messer, the step-daughter of Sellars. The car had been sold by Sellars to Harris with financing by the Bank. Sellars co-signed Harris's note. When Harris defaulted, the Bank looked to Sellars. The car was repossessed at Sellars' instigation.

There is ample evidence that Sellars had control over the vehicle. He maintained and stored it. He had it available for his regular use. He was making the payments on it. Beneficial ownership was properly found in Sellars although legal title remained in Harris and the Bank held the certificate of title and Harris's power of attorney.

These facts do not require a finding of any bailment of the auto to the Bank by either Harris or Sellars.

Because the auto was available for Sellars' regular use, in fact beneficially owned by Sellars, it clearly was excluded under Sellars' insurance policy with Safeco. Alternatively, Messer, Sellars' step-daughter, was clearly resident of her mother's separate household and, therefore, her accidents are not covered under the policy.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., C.J., and McCORD, J., concur.


Summaries of

Harrell v. Sellars

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jan 19, 1983
424 So. 2d 881 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

noting that Defendant who "had control over the vehicle," "maintained and stored it," and "had it available for his regular use" was properly considered the vehicle's beneficial owner even though legal title remained in another

Summary of this case from LM Ins. Corp. v. Occidental Fire & Cas. Co.
Case details for

Harrell v. Sellars

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY DUANE HARRELL, BY HIS NEXT FRIEND HERMAN B. HARRELL, AND HERMAN B…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jan 19, 1983

Citations

424 So. 2d 881 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Citing Cases

Wummer v. Lowary by Lowary

Beneficial ownership carries with it liability for damages which arise from an automobile's negligent…

LM Ins. Corp. v. Occidental Fire & Cas. Co.

Id. at 365 (citations omitted). See also Harrell v. Sellars, 424 So. 2d 881, 882 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) (noting…