Harrell v. Marshall

Full title: EDWARD HARRELL, Petitioner, v. JOHN MARSHALL, Warden, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division

Date published: Feb 16, 2011

SACV 06-153 R (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2011)

Opinion

EDWARD HARRELL, Petitioner, v. JOHN MARSHALL, Warden, Respondent. No. SACV 06-153 R (FFM) United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division. February 16, 2011

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          MANUEL L. REAL, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire record in this action, the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"), and the objections thereto. Good cause appearing, the Court concurs with and adopts the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations contained in the Report after having made a de novo determination of the portions to which objections were directed. The Court further finds that petitioner was provided the due process rights to which he was entitled in connection with the conduct of the parole hearing as required by Swarthout v. Cooke, 562 U.S. ___, 2011 WL 197627. ( See Exhibit B to Petition.)

         IT IS ORDERED that judgment be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.